As summarized in
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/77#issuecomment-2843228280 the
motivation is that the complicated retry logic this introduced was
making the cleanup task #12628 harder to accomplish. It was not easy to
ascertain just what policy / semantics the extra control-flow was
implementing, in order to figure out a different way to implementing it
either.
After talking to Eelco about it, he decided we could just....get rid of
the feature entirely! It's a bit scary removing a decade+ old feature,
but I think he is right. See the release notes for more explanation.
This reverts commit 299141ecbd.
Co-authored-by: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
This renders the rl-next notes when `officialRelease = false`, which
corresponds to the case where we're not on a release branch.
Previously we had disabled this behavior because changelog-d is
somewhat of a heavy dependency, being the only Haskell package.
However, we now have new circumstances that topple the tradeoff.
- We render `master` docs to https://nix.dev/manual/nix/development/release-notes/rl-next.html
- `.#manual` is a separate build now, so `nix build nix/foo` is
not affected by the increased closure of build input outputs.
Because of these factors, I believe adding this functionality back
is more valuable, as we can use it to
- Previous release notes
- Showcase the upcoming release to the community
warning: installing Nix as root is not supported by this script!
performing a single-user installation of Nix...
copying Nix to /nix/store.......................................................
......
warning: the group 'nixbld' specified in 'build-users-group' does not exist
warning: the group 'nixbld' specified in 'build-users-group' does not exist
installing 'nix-2.28.3'
error: the group 'nixbld' specified in 'build-users-group' does not exist
/tmp/nix-binary-tarball-unpack.2j3lCU0A89/unpack/nix-2.28.3-x86_64-linux/install: unable to install Nix into your default profile
sometimes it's these little things that let beginners stumble at the
first step...
mentioning one potentially foreign concept while introducing an entirely
new concept is asking enough already.
