Previous code had a sneaky bug due to which no caching
actually happened:
```cpp
auto linesForInput = (*lines)[origin->offset];
```
That should have been:
```cpp
auto & linesForInput = (*lines)[origin->offset];
```
See [1].
Now that it also makes sense to make the cache bound in side
in order not to memoize all the sources without freeing any memory.
The default cache size has been chosen somewhat arbitrarily to be ~64k
origins. For reference, 25.05 nixpkgs has ~50k .nix files.
Simple benchmark:
```nix
let
pkgs = import <nixpkgs> { };
in
builtins.foldl' (acc: el: acc + el.line) 0 (
builtins.genList (x: builtins.unsafeGetAttrPos "gcc" pkgs) 10000
)
```
(After)
```
$ hyperfine "result/bin/nix eval -f ./test.nix"
Benchmark 1: result/bin/nix eval -f ./test.nix
Time (mean ± σ): 292.7 ms ± 3.9 ms [User: 131.0 ms, System: 120.5 ms]
Range (min … max): 288.1 ms … 300.5 ms 10 runs
```
(Before)
```
hyperfine "nix eval -f ./test.nix"
Benchmark 1: nix eval -f ./test.nix
Time (mean ± σ): 666.7 ms ± 6.4 ms [User: 428.3 ms, System: 191.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 659.7 ms … 681.3 ms 10 runs
```
If the origin happens to be a `all-packages.nix` or similar in size then the
difference is much more dramatic.
[1]: 22e3f0e987
Try to make `DerivationGoal` care less whether we're working from an
in-memory derivation or not.
It's a clean-up in its own right, but it will also help with other
cleanups under the umbrella of #12628.
Now, each class provides the initial coroutine by value. This avoids
some sketchy virtual function stuff, and will also be further put to
good use in the next commit.
As summarized in
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/77#issuecomment-2843228280 the
motivation is that the complicated retry logic this introduced was
making the cleanup task #12628 harder to accomplish. It was not easy to
ascertain just what policy / semantics the extra control-flow was
implementing, in order to figure out a different way to implementing it
either.
After talking to Eelco about it, he decided we could just....get rid of
the feature entirely! It's a bit scary removing a decade+ old feature,
but I think he is right. See the release notes for more explanation.
This reverts commit 299141ecbd.
Co-authored-by: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
Leverage #10766 to show how we can now resolve a store configuration
without actually opening the store for that resolved configuration.
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Splicing the list element to the back can be done in
a much simpler and concise way without the need for
erasing and re-inserting the element. Doing it this
way is equivalent to just moving node pointers around,
whereas inserting/erasing allocates/deallocates new nodes.
