Logging to another Logger was kind of nonsensical - it was really just
an easy way to get it to write its output to stderr, but that only
works if the underlying logger writes to stderr.
This change is needed to make it easy to log JSON output somewhere
else (like a file or socket).
It is unused in Nix currently, but will be used in Hydra. This reflects
what Hydra does in https://github.com/NixOS/hydra/pull/1387.
We may probably to use it more widely for better SSH store performance,
but this needs to be subject to more testing before we do that.
This is a first step towards PR #10760, and the issues it addresses.
See the Doxygen for details.
Thanks to these changes, we are able to drastically restrict how the
rest of the code-base uses `ParseDerivation`.
Co-Authored-By: HaeNoe <git@haenoe.party>
It's best we teach users that the "foo" derivation is less than pure in the sense that it cannot be built just on any system, in particular that builders cannot be selected arbitrarily but based on their system-features. The `"recursive-nix"` system-feature is automatically defined by `--extra-experimental-features recursive-nix`
I do not believe there is any problem with computing
`hashDerivationModulo` the normal way with impure derivations.
Conversely, the way this used to work is very suspicious because two
almost-equal derivations that only differ in depending on different
impure derivations could have the same drv hash modulo. That is very
suspicious because there is no reason to think those two different
impure derivations will end up producing the same content-addressed
data!
Co-authored-by: Alain Zscheile <zseri.devel@ytrizja.de>
E.g. in a derivation attribute `foo = ./bar`, if ./bar is a symlink,
we should copy the symlink to the store, not its target. This restores
the behaviour of Nix <= 2.19.
"content-address*ed*" derivation is misleading because all derivations
are *themselves* content-addressed. What may or may not be
content-addressed is not derivation itself, but the *output* of the
derivation.
The outputs are not *part* of the derivation (for then the derivation
wouldn't be complete before we built it) but rather separate entities
produced by the derivation.
"content-adddress*ed*" is not correctly because it can only describe
what the derivation *is*, and that is not what we are trying to do.
"content-address*ing*" is correct because it describes what the
derivation *does* --- it produces content-addressed data.
