MonitorFdHup: replace pthread_cancel trick with a notification pipe

On https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/8946, we faced a surprising
behaviour wrt. exception when using pthread_cancel. In a nutshell when
a thread is inside a catch block and it's getting pthread_cancel by
another one, then the original exception is bubbled up and crashes the
process.

We now poll on the notification pipe from the thread and exit when the
main thread closes its end. This solution does not exhibit surprising
behaviour wrt. exceptions.

Co-authored-by: Mic92 <joerg@thalheim.io>

Fixes https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/8946

See also Lix https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/1605 which is very
similar by coincidence. Pulled a comment from that.

(cherry picked from commit 1c636284a3)

src/libutil-tests/monitorfdhup.cc

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+#include "util.hh"
+#include "monitor-fd.hh"
+
+#include <sys/file.h>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+namespace nix {
+TEST(MonitorFdHup, shouldNotBlock)
+{
+    Pipe p;
+    p.create();
+    {
+        // when monitor gets destroyed it should cancel the
+        // background thread and do not block
+        MonitorFdHup monitor(p.readSide.get());
+    }
+}
+}

src/libutil/unix/monitor-fd.hh

@@ -18,27 +18,45 @@ class MonitorFdHup
 {
 private:
     std::thread thread;
+    Pipe notifyPipe;
 
 public:
     MonitorFdHup(int fd)
     {
-        thread = std::thread([fd]() {
+        notifyPipe.create();
+        thread = std::thread([this, fd]() {
             while (true) {
-                /* Wait indefinitely until a POLLHUP occurs. */
-                constexpr size_t num_fds = 1;
-                struct pollfd fds[num_fds] = {
-                    {
-                        .fd = fd,
-                        .events =
                 /* Polling for no specific events (i.e. just waiting
                    for an error/hangup) doesn't work on macOS
                    anymore. So wait for read events and ignore
                    them. */
+                // FIXME(jade): we have looked at the XNU kernel code and as
+                // far as we can tell, the above is bogus. It should be the
+                // case that the previous version of this and the current
+                // version are identical: waiting for POLLHUP and POLLRDNORM in
+                // the kernel *should* be identical.
+                // https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/xnu/blob/94d3b452840153a99b38a3a9659680b2a006908e/bsd/kern/sys_generic.c#L1751-L1758
+                //
+                // So, this needs actual testing and we need to figure out if
+                // this is actually bogus.
+                short hangup_events =
 #ifdef __APPLE__
-                            POLLRDNORM,
+                    POLLRDNORM
 #else
-                            0,
+                    0
 #endif
+                    ;
+
+                /* Wait indefinitely until a POLLHUP occurs. */
+                constexpr size_t num_fds = 2;
+                struct pollfd fds[num_fds] = {
+                    {
+                        .fd = fd,
+                        .events = hangup_events,
+                    },
+                    {
+                        .fd = notifyPipe.readSide.get(),
+                        .events = hangup_events,
                     },
                 };
 
@@ -48,7 +66,6 @@ public:
                         continue;
                     throw SysError("failed to poll() in MonitorFdHup");
                 }
-
                 /* This shouldn't happen, but can on macOS due to a bug.
                    See rdar://37550628.
 
@@ -62,6 +79,9 @@ public:
                     unix::triggerInterrupt();
                     break;
                 }
+                if (fds[1].revents & POLLHUP) {
+                    break;
+                }
                 /* This will only happen on macOS. We sleep a bit to
                    avoid waking up too often if the client is sending
                    input. */
@@ -72,7 +92,7 @@ public:
 
     ~MonitorFdHup()
     {
-        pthread_cancel(thread.native_handle());
+        close(notifyPipe.writeSide.get());
         thread.join();
     }
 };