1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/nix synced 2025-06-29 02:11:15 +02:00

libexpr: Support structured error classes

While preparing PRs like #9753, I've had to change error messages in
dozens of code paths. It would be nice if instead of

    EvalError("expected 'boolean' but found '%1%'", showType(v))

we could write

    TypeError(v, "boolean")

or similar. Then, changing the error message could be a mechanical
refactor with the compiler pointing out places the constructor needs to
be changed, rather than the error-prone process of grepping through the
codebase. Structured errors would also help prevent the "same" error
from having multiple slightly different messages, and could be a first
step towards error codes / an error index.

This PR reworks the exception infrastructure in `libexpr` to
support exception types with different constructor signatures than
`BaseError`. Actually refactoring the exceptions to use structured data
will come in a future PR (this one is big enough already, as it has to
touch every exception in `libexpr`).

The core design is in `eval-error.hh`. Generally, errors like this:

    state.error("'%s' is not a string", getAttrPathStr())
      .debugThrow<TypeError>()

are transformed like this:

    state.error<TypeError>("'%s' is not a string", getAttrPathStr())
      .debugThrow()

The type annotation has moved from `ErrorBuilder::debugThrow` to
`EvalState::error`.
This commit is contained in:
Rebecca Turner 2024-01-22 17:08:29 -08:00
parent c62c21e29a
commit c6a89c1a16
No known key found for this signature in database
40 changed files with 653 additions and 545 deletions

View file

@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ std::pair<Value *, PosIdx> findAlongAttrPath(EvalState & state, const std::strin
if (!attrIndex) {
if (v->type() != nAttrs)
throw TypeError(
state.error<TypeError>(
"the expression selected by the selection path '%1%' should be a set but is %2%",
attrPath,
showType(*v));
showType(*v)).debugThrow();
if (attr.empty())
throw Error("empty attribute name in selection path '%1%'", attrPath);
@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ std::pair<Value *, PosIdx> findAlongAttrPath(EvalState & state, const std::strin
else {
if (!v->isList())
throw TypeError(
state.error<TypeError>(
"the expression selected by the selection path '%1%' should be a list but is %2%",
attrPath,
showType(*v));
showType(*v)).debugThrow();
if (*attrIndex >= v->listSize())
throw AttrPathNotFound("list index %1% in selection path '%2%' is out of range", *attrIndex, attrPath);